How We Rate

Our Review Methodology at Sharkgym

At Sharkgym (sharkgym.org), every casino and Aviator game platform reviewed on this site goes through a rigorous, structured evaluation process before a single score is published. Our founder and lead reviewer, James Wilson, personally tests each platform to ensure that Indian players receive honest, accurate, and up-to-date information before they deposit real money. This page explains exactly how we work, what we look for, and why you can trust the ratings you see across our site.

Who Conducts the Reviews

All reviews published on Sharkgym are researched, tested, and written by James Wilson. James has spent years evaluating online gambling platforms with a specific focus on crash games and the Aviator game format in the Indian market. He does not rely on operator-supplied information or promotional materials. Every rating reflects hands-on experience using real accounts, real deposits, and real gameplay conducted in 2026 under current platform conditions.

James is not employed by, affiliated with, or compensated directly by any casino or software provider reviewed on this site. His conclusions are his own, based entirely on the testing process described below.

Our Step-by-Step Review Process

Step 1: Initial Research and Licensing Verification

Before James creates an account, he researches the platform's legal standing. This includes verifying the operator's gambling license, checking regulatory bodies such as the Malta Gaming Authority, Curaçao eGaming, or other recognised authorities, and confirming that the site accepts players from India legally and transparently.

Step 2: Account Registration and KYC Testing

James registers a genuine player account using standard details. He documents how smooth the sign-up process is, what identity verification (KYC) documents are required, and how long verification takes. This mirrors the exact experience an Indian player would have.

Step 3: Bonus Claiming and Terms Analysis

All welcome bonuses, free bets, and promotional offers are claimed and tested. James reads the full terms and conditions, including wagering requirements, game restrictions, withdrawal caps, and expiry dates. He does not simply quote the headline bonus figure — he evaluates whether the offer delivers real value.

Step 4: Aviator Game and Platform Testing

James plays the Aviator game and other available titles using his own funded account. He evaluates loading speeds, interface quality, fairness indicators (provably fair mechanisms), and overall gameplay experience across both desktop and mobile devices.

Step 5: Payment Method Testing

Deposits and withdrawals are tested using methods popular in India, including UPI, Paytm, bank transfers, and cryptocurrency where available. James records processing times, fees, minimum and maximum limits, and any friction encountered during the cashout process.

Step 6: Customer Support Evaluation

James contacts the support team via live chat, email, and where available, phone. He records response times, the quality of answers, and whether agents have genuine knowledge of platform issues relevant to Indian players.

Step 7: Mobile Experience Assessment

The platform is accessed on a mobile browser and, where applicable, a dedicated app. James evaluates responsiveness, game availability on mobile, and ease of navigation on smaller screens.

Rating Criteria and Weightings

Each platform receives a final score out of 10, calculated using the following weighted criteria:

Rating Category	Weighting	What We Evaluate
Licensing and Safety	25%	Valid gambling license, SSL encryption, responsible gambling tools, fairness certification
Bonuses and Promotions	20%	Welcome offer value, wagering requirements, ongoing promotions, Aviator-specific deals
Game Selection	20%	Aviator game availability, software providers, game variety, RTP transparency
Payment Methods	15%	India-friendly options, withdrawal speed, fees, minimum deposit limits
Customer Support	10%	Availability, response time, quality of assistance, language support
Mobile Experience	10%	Mobile site or app quality, game performance, ease of use on smartphones

Understanding Our Rating Scale

All Sharkgym ratings are presented on a scale of 1 to 10, where higher scores represent better overall quality. Here is how to interpret each range:

9.0 – 10.0 — Excellent: Outstanding platforms that lead the market for Indian Aviator players. Safe, generous, and reliable.
7.0 – 8.9 — Good: Solid platforms with minor weaknesses. Recommended for most players.
5.0 – 6.9 — Average: Acceptable platforms with notable limitations. Proceed with awareness of the drawbacks noted in the review.
3.0 – 4.9 — Below Average: Platforms with significant issues in key areas. Not recommended without reading the full review carefully.
1.0 – 2.9 — Poor: Platforms we do not recommend. Serious concerns around safety, fairness, or player treatment.

How Sharkgym Stays Unbiased

Independence is central to everything we publish. Sharkgym may earn referral commissions when readers sign up through our links — this is how the site funds its operations. However, commercial relationships never influence our scores or recommendations. Platforms are rated solely on merit as determined through James Wilson's personal testing process.

To protect editorial integrity, we follow these principles:

James Wilson personally tests every platform before a review is published — no review is based on second-hand information or operator briefings.
Negative findings are always reported in full, regardless of any affiliate relationship with the operator.
Reviews are updated whenever significant platform changes occur, ensuring scores remain current in 2026 and beyond.
No operator can pay to alter or remove a published rating on Sharkgym.
Platforms that fail basic safety or licensing checks are not recommended, regardless of commission potential.

If you have a question about our methodology or believe a review requires updating, you are welcome to contact us directly through the Sharkgym website. We take reader feedback seriously and review all concerns raised.

```